<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ever Declining Fall of CNET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/the-ever-declining-fall-of-cnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/the-ever-declining-fall-of-cnet/</link>
	<description>Tracking Trends in Online Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Krug</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/the-ever-declining-fall-of-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 08:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/the-ever-declining-fall-of-cnet/#comment-212</guid>
		<description>I agree us little guys make a tiny dent. But it all adds up to lost revenues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree us little guys make a tiny dent. But it all adds up to lost revenues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Krug</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/the-ever-declining-fall-of-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 08:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/the-ever-declining-fall-of-cnet/#comment-630</guid>
		<description>I agree us little guys make a tiny dent. But it all adds up to lost revenues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree us little guys make a tiny dent. But it all adds up to lost revenues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hso</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/the-ever-declining-fall-of-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>hso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/the-ever-declining-fall-of-cnet/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>The little guys really probably only make a very small dent, it’s the big guys that employ 4 to 6 guys to get their scoop that are stealing the show. If I remember right, even BBC had referenced TechCrunch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The little guys really probably only make a very small dent, it’s the big guys that employ 4 to 6 guys to get their scoop that are stealing the show. If I remember right, even BBC had referenced TechCrunch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hso</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/the-ever-declining-fall-of-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>hso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/the-ever-declining-fall-of-cnet/#comment-629</guid>
		<description>The little guys really probably only make a very small dent, it’s the big guys that employ 4 to 6 guys to get their scoop that are stealing the show. If I remember right, even BBC had referenced TechCrunch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The little guys really probably only make a very small dent, it’s the big guys that employ 4 to 6 guys to get their scoop that are stealing the show. If I remember right, even BBC had referenced TechCrunch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

