<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interview With Myself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/</link>
	<description>Tracking Trends in Online Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 01:46:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Krug</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Roughly 30-40k in advertising based revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roughly 30-40k in advertising based revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Before your automatic refresh deletes my comment for the 3rd time... let me post this fast:

Out of the 150k .. if you deduct your brokering site deals, selling sites that you&#039;ve developed, and flipping sites .. how much of that was from regular blogging and advertising revenues?  *curious*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before your automatic refresh deletes my comment for the 3rd time&#8230; let me post this fast:</p>
<p>Out of the 150k .. if you deduct your brokering site deals, selling sites that you&#8217;ve developed, and flipping sites .. how much of that was from regular blogging and advertising revenues?  *curious*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Krug</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Everyone has their downside. Trust me I have mine. I&#039;m a bit rough around the edges. But truth is I&#039;m just a human who loves this industry. Although not as much as I used to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone has their downside. Trust me I have mine. I&#8217;m a bit rough around the edges. But truth is I&#8217;m just a human who loves this industry. Although not as much as I used to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilma Ham</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilma Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Hi David, your entries are as good as your photos. Sometimes I think that guy is too good to be true. But that is doing you and me a diservice. I will keep liking what you say until Sharon proves otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, your entries are as good as your photos. Sometimes I think that guy is too good to be true. But that is doing you and me a diservice. I will keep liking what you say until Sharon proves otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Ng</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a relief!  Forget this generic stuff, and give us the real goodies. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a relief!  Forget this generic stuff, and give us the real goodies. <img src='http://www.telegraphik.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Krug</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>There was a 60/40 sarcasm ratio going on here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a 60/40 sarcasm ratio going on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Ng</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>David -  I wasn&#039;t sure if you were serious in this self-interview or not.  You truly sounded like any other &quot;you-need-to-work-hard-and-not-forget-the-little-guys&quot; interviews out there.

I hope this was written in a sarcastic tone, because if not, it&#039;s quite disappointing compared to the quality articles you usually write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211;  I wasn&#8217;t sure if you were serious in this self-interview or not.  You truly sounded like any other &#8220;you-need-to-work-hard-and-not-forget-the-little-guys&#8221; interviews out there.</p>
<p>I hope this was written in a sarcastic tone, because if not, it&#8217;s quite disappointing compared to the quality articles you usually write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Sarmiento</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Sarmiento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telegraphik.com/2007/an-interview-with-myself/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Now this is a hard hitting interview!  ;-)

I think that the best bloggers blog not only because they love it, but also because of the lifestyle that it allows them to have, and money is a part of that. 

So, I know you say you don&#039;t do it for the money, but the fact that you can make $150K in a year is a huge deal. Not everyone can do that. Not every blogger can do that. The fact that you can means that you have much more flexibility with your lifestyle than folks/bloggers who do not make that kind of dough. 

David I am going to interview you for real one day and get some real dirt. Get ready to be put in the hot seat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is a hard hitting interview!  <img src='http://www.telegraphik.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think that the best bloggers blog not only because they love it, but also because of the lifestyle that it allows them to have, and money is a part of that. </p>
<p>So, I know you say you don&#8217;t do it for the money, but the fact that you can make $150K in a year is a huge deal. Not everyone can do that. Not every blogger can do that. The fact that you can means that you have much more flexibility with your lifestyle than folks/bloggers who do not make that kind of dough. </p>
<p>David I am going to interview you for real one day and get some real dirt. Get ready to be put in the hot seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
